From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jan 20 0:26:51 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F3B37B401 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:26:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from seed.net.tw (sn12.seed.net.tw [139.175.54.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239F143EB2 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 00:26:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leafy@leafy.idv.tw) Received: from [211.74.18.39] (port=51106 helo=leafy.idv.tw) by seed.net.tw with esmtp (Seednet 4.10:3) id 18aXGV-000B9w-00 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:26:43 +0800 Received: from leafy.idv.tw (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leafy.idv.tw (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h0K8QgB2031382 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:26:42 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from leafy@leafy.idv.tw) Received: (from leafy@localhost) by leafy.idv.tw (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h0K8QfPF031381 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:26:41 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 16:26:41 +0800 From: leafy To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: gcc -kthread Message-ID: <20030120082641.GA31370@leafy.idv.tw> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <000b01c2bfc0$8ed86e90$e602a8c0@shara.net> <20030119144233.GA1056@graf.pompo.net> <007901c2bfd0$3ee5de30$e602a8c0@shara.net> <20030119230901.GA89120@rot13.obsecurity.org> <002601c2c029$a0063a30$e602a8c0@shara.net> <20030120082339.GC92001@rot13.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=big5 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030120082339.GC92001@rot13.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:23:39AM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > (just curious: has it ever worked, and why was it removed?) > > No. An improved (relative to other OSes) kernel threading system is > being developed in the 5.0 branch ("KSE"). > > Kris Since you brought this up(*grin*), how different is KSE to NetBSD's new thread activation scheme? The FreeBSD KSE page does not say much about the implementation details. Sincerely, leafy -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message