Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 1 May 2006 15:34:55 -0400
From:      "michael johnson" <buhnux@gmail.com>
To:        "Joe Marcus Clarke" <marcus@freebsd.org>
Cc:        ports@freebsd.org, gnome@freebsd.org, kde@freebsd.org, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [kde-freebsd] Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.14 being merged into the tree
Message-ID:  <b2203fed0605011234t340a3496n70c082cb54164613@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <445649E3.7000603@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <1146349274.16564.18.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <b2203fed0604301032t1798001dpa7c88c9616c52533@mail.gmail.com> <44562619.3090403@freebsd.org> <op.s8vsu4xo9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <44563C14.1050104@freebsd.org> <b2203fed0605010953o57c631d1ua74d743c4b7a9202@mail.gmail.com> <445641CC.809@freebsd.org> <44564523.10709@freebsd.org> <b2203fed0605011044h11b7411em580401d8a8b18305@mail.gmail.com> <445649E3.7000603@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/1/06, Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> michael johnson wrote:
> > On 5/1/06, Michael Nottebrock <lofi@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> Michael Nottebrock schrieb:
> >> > michael johnson schrieb:
> >> >
> >> >> kdegraphics depends on xpdf and gnome depends on poppler.
> >> >> and xpdf and poppler conflict. However, kdegraphics could
> >> >> depend on poppler, it is a dropin replacement for xpdf. =3D)
> >> >
> >> > That's doable, I'll get right on it.
> >>
> >> Actually, I think it would be best to split the poppler port up one
> more
> >> time and create an extra port for the command line utilities, that way
> >> the conflict with xpdf can be resolved completely. Should I work on
> that?
> >
> >
> > If you split the tools it will still have to depend on the poppler lib.
>
> But you wouldn't have to necessarily install the command bits.  Is that
> a true statement?  That is, if we only installed the poppler libraries
> and headers would we be crippling envince?


evince doesn't use any of the command bits.
I think it might be a good idea to split it then.

Michael


Joe
>
> - --
> Joe Marcus Clarke
> FreeBSD GNOME Team      ::      gnome@FreeBSD.org
> FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (Darwin)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFEVknjb2iPiv4Uz4cRAj/gAJ9YFE6ZSOIOH822M1lZ1VqcIyv0XACgm3a4
> 9U8k1xiJmcIR+Ym+p3dA/iY=3D
> =3DY9xg
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b2203fed0605011234t340a3496n70c082cb54164613>