From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Jun 30 11:37:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f232.law11.hotmail.com [64.4.17.232]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538D337BAD6 for ; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:31:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from part_lion@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 10:31:59 -0700 Received: from 207.204.127.70 by lw11fd.law11.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 30 Jun 2001 17:31:58 GMT X-Originating-IP: [207.204.127.70] From: "Joesh Juphland" To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: why not two ep pc-cards in one system ? Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2001 11:31:58 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jun 2001 17:31:59.0123 (UTC) FILETIME=[90E69630:01C1018A] Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am trying to run two 3com 3c589 pc-cards in one system. Technically one is a straight 3c589 and one is 3c589c. irqs are good, since I can put any one of the two 3c589's into the laptop along with a wavelan (wi) and both cards show up fine and work. But when I put two 3c589's in, the first one works great (ep0) but during startup the second one ends up: hostname pccardd[87]: No free configuration for card 3Com Corporation and consequently, only ep0 shows up in `ifconfig -a` - ep1 is nowhere to be found. My /etc/rc.conf looks like: pccard_enable="YES" pccard_mem="DEFAULT" pccard_flags=" -i 10 -i 15" removable_interfaces="ep0 ep1" my /etc/defaults/pccard.conf file has not been changed. Again, either card will work on its own, and either card will work in conjunction with some other card like the lucent wavelan... thanks. _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message