From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 29 10:36:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C9AF106564A for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:36:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB778FC0A for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yenl8 with SMTP id l8so742032yen.13 for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:36:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DER3J8VQ1uBd/81J63yUKS7bzWsdeSrDI/jRSIcs5zQ=; b=ekB0QrWqnVxZ/MmSOVm9d/2fSkN8mZjvlHjNasZ1Iz4nnu46C9E6toSgSIJ/Q9bnlS Csh8BMYqrCPIVwhESIzbyFbs0nMzKfo0ztrzyE+zSVIo9KIMqR7WduMEkl60mshIpm2f Akn9gphQ4Hw960OPgZ2cd9K5xgHZs37eqRIJ8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=DER3J8VQ1uBd/81J63yUKS7bzWsdeSrDI/jRSIcs5zQ=; b=UNIlXIeKuOo4BJwSN/kDHcnnpIeXeyNxnJb6HJi8LGV/NeT5t6QASVh4jNQdF525/w 5PWJnMiVjNtnJEwRzQ0NMFnf0kt8K7fI4zlWU1kxdDe3O7TKGWpLd0e/N89jXKRQhtoL YAu1Y76qsi5Vbdpwh5IkKG9pwndYuvccrhiuMx92BWCy8cVibpfaOAiW4Z/yrLedNCza h8gaHGjqK3uJjiineAolGdZkA3ONakPxvybRA2mXS7NlMVX3DlK4B6oEs5Pedqx+SGF5 nTx/mkWkMReVL+wG3UnCKAIeOft6+l1jo3cxjs3ikMgx29iDnn+2kSQKTHNRXsuGdfCf rrtA== Received: by 10.236.42.69 with SMTP id i45mr7933350yhb.7.1348915008307; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:36:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k2sm12244374anl.11.2012.09.29.03.36.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sat, 29 Sep 2012 03:36:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3XTR591HPwz2CG5t for ; Sat, 29 Sep 2012 06:36:45 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 06:36:44 -0400 From: Jerry To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120929063644.056508e0@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <257237997.10964075.1348870949234.JavaMail.root@k-state.edu> References: <20120927021527.GA43120@regency.nsu.ru> <257237997.10964075.1348870949234.JavaMail.root@k-state.edu> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.6; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmNJQdirK2fcqAC1Rrp+un0ZdyPf9bxbLbfQg6mbtwYriJYDRTSDstTIf6wDVoU2gLAeEWv Subject: Re: CFT: x11/nvidia-driver major update to 304.xx series X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:36:55 -0000 On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 18:22:29 -0400 (EDT) Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng. articulated: > Well, I had to a bunch of reboots yesterday....so I tried > 304.51....no joy. I then tried 295.75, and that works. In the past, I have had problems that occurred when I updated a port and failed to rebuild the ports that were dependent upon that port. It is rare, but it does happen. In such instances, I find that "portmanager" used with the "-p" flag comes in extremely handy. I might suggest that you first update your ports tree and then run something like: "portmanager -u -l -y -p" It will do all of that automatically for you and provide you with a log file should something not work as expected. Just a thought. -- Jerry ♔ Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________