From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 00:04:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE4CD76; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@feld.me) Received: from feld.me (unknown [IPv6:2607:f4e0:100:300::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF92692; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:04:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=feld.me; s=blargle; h=In-Reply-To:Message-Id:From:Mime-Version:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:Content-Type; bh=UyDlJ+yO8higm5N82KRkByTiZs7a5Mb8xgikk2/e/q8=; b=nNwCEanwwgcpjHZj/itmhIy+BOt3ErMAFREetiV63uWJbumuqbrNoXPXUvBqUqItn05RCPeQGMjGA/IagjqhNAo7Ytj/F+hveeOcVJJ6NHSPT0d4VEsftUpQDsjhDHi2; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mwi1.coffeenet.org) by feld.me with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1U8JeU-0000qf-Cq; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:04:42 -0600 Received: from feld@feld.me by mwi1.coffeenet.org (Archiveopteryx 3.1.4) with esmtpsa id 1361405076-61085-51256/5/3; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:04:36 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: mexas@bristol.ac.uk, "O. Hartmann" Subject: Re: PathScale EKO Path 5 not for FreeBSD anymore? References: <201302200909.r1K99lx0029375@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <5124B115.70707@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 18:04:36 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 From: Mark Felder Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <5124B115.70707@zedat.fu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Opera Mail/12.13 (FreeBSD) Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:04:50 -0000 I've been talking to others and it seems that several of us are convinced that BSD is back on the uptake, so I wouldn't be so quick to mark its demise. :-)