From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 19 14:23:20 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B0616A4CE for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:23:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from FS.Denninger.Net (wsip-68-15-213-52.at.at.cox.net [68.15.213.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29B443D31 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:23:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from karl@FS.Denninger.Net) Received: from fs.denninger.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by FS.Denninger.Net (8.12.10/8.12.8) with SMTP id j0JENJcM017511 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:23:19 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from karl@FS.Denninger.Net) Received: from fs.denninger.net [127.0.0.1] by Spamblock-sys; Wed Jan 19 08:23:19 2005 Received: (from karl@localhost) by FS.Denninger.Net (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id j0JENJkA017509 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:23:19 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <20050119082319.A17451@Denninger.Net> Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 08:23:19 -0600 From: Karl Denninger To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i Organization: Karl's Sushi and Packet Smashers X-Die-Spammers: Spammers cheerfully broiled for supper and served with ketchup! Subject: OK, it appears to be running, but what's this?! (gmirror) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 14:23:20 -0000 Ok, so I found the "how to get gmirror to play nice" page, and set it up. But, what's this??! Gen2# bsdlabel /dev/mirror/m0s1 # /dev/mirror/m0s1: 8 partitions: # size offset fstype [fsize bsize bps/cpg] a: 10485760 63 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 b: 10485760 10485823 swap c: 490223412 63 unused 0 0 # "raw" part, don't edit d: 41943040 20971583 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 e: 125829120 62914623 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 f: 83886080 188743743 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 g: 167772160 272629823 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 h: 48234496 440401983 4.2BSD 2048 16384 28552 partition c: partition extends past end of unit disklabel: partition c doesn't start at 0! disklabel: An incorrect partition c may cause problems for standard system utilities Uh, no, I didn't do that. The original label was put there during system installation, and I absolutely did not offset "c" Is this still ok, or am I asking for a (bogus) hard error some day when the system attempts access beyond the end of the physical disk? -- -- Karl Denninger (karl@denninger.net) Internet Consultant & Kids Rights Activist http://www.denninger.net My home on the net - links to everything I do! http://scubaforum.org Your UNCENSORED place to talk about DIVING! http://www.spamcuda.net SPAM FREE mailboxes - FREE FOR A LIMITED TIME! http://genesis3.blogspot.com Musings Of A Sentient Mind