Date: Wed, 8 Jan 2003 23:05:33 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3?= Pasternak <michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com> Cc: paul beard <paulbeard@mac.com>, advocacy@freebsd.org, sellis@telus.net Subject: Re: [Fwd: web write-up] Message-ID: <20030108220533.GB18151@pasternak.w.lub.pl> In-Reply-To: <3E1C9249.551D6932@mindspring.com> References: <3E1C8287.1020506@mac.com> <3E1C9249.551D6932@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Terry Lambert [Wed, Jan 08, 2003 at 01:04:09PM -0800]: > This is a very old article. All it demonstrates that the software > that was used in the statistics gathering was written with bad > assumptions by people who did not know how to make code run fast > anywhere but Linux. We all know, that 99% of benchmarks and statistics are untrue, but does any of you know about a recent surveys comparing speed of (network|filesystem|vm|anything else) on FreeBSD and Linux? I'm especially concerned about softupdates + dirhash compared to ext3fs or reiser. NVidia's drivers performance should be also easy to perform. -- mp To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030108220533.GB18151>