From owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 27 18:43:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A86D416A4CE for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 18:43:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from santiago.pacific.net.sg (santiago.pacific.net.sg [203.120.90.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8CE5643D31 for ; Thu, 27 May 2004 18:43:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from oceanare@pacific.net.sg) Received: (qmail 8579 invoked from network); 28 May 2004 01:42:49 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO maxwell6.pacific.net.sg) (203.120.90.212) by santiago with SMTP; 28 May 2004 01:42:48 -0000 Received: from pacific.net.sg ([210.24.202.26]) by maxwell6.pacific.net.sg with ESMTP id <20040528014248.VXXY1186.maxwell6.pacific.net.sg@pacific.net.sg>; Fri, 28 May 2004 09:42:48 +0800 Message-ID: <40B69910.1080601@pacific.net.sg> Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 09:42:40 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky Organization: oceanare pte ltd User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7b) Gecko/20040409 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eitarou Kamo References: <40B5FC44.4060107@trio.plala.or.jp><200405271117.00553.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <40B609D4.5030108@trio.plala.or.jp> <0b9401c44400$f8dbf530$7b07000a@int.mediasurface.com> <40B610A8.1030203@trio.plala.or.jp> In-Reply-To: <40B610A8.1030203@trio.plala.or.jp> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.org cc: Steven Hartland Subject: Re: SMP of 4.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD SMP implementation group List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 01:43:46 -0000 Hi, Eitarou Kamo wrote: > Hi, > > Steven Hartland wrote: > > >>We use 5.2.1 SMP on all our new production level servers >>and have not had any problems. Infact it runs better and >>is the only version that runs on some of the newer hardware. >> >> Steve >> >> > > Sounds good! BTW, is 5.2.1 SMP faster than 4.X one? > 5.2 has two options for the scheduler. Sometimes it is faster, sometimes it is slower. There have been several threads in this list dealing with it. I use 5.2 without any problems. Erich