From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 10 22:37:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2319316A4CE for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:37:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from totem.fix.no (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E18DC43D1D for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2004 22:37:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from anders@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) by totem.fix.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F7E9892A; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:37:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from totem.fix.no ([80.91.36.20]) by localhost (totem.fix.no [80.91.36.20]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 81818-04-9; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:37:31 +0100 (CET) Received: by totem.fix.no (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DC43A986D7; Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:37:31 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:37:31 +0100 From: Anders Nordby To: Trevor Johnson Message-ID: <20040211063731.GA81793@totem.fix.no> References: <20040210180238.GA16205@teddy.fas.com> <40291E81.6010803@math.missouri.edu> <20040210132410.F90776@blues.jpj.net> <20040210222951.GB27223@teddy.fas.com> <20040210215513.Y35085@blues.jpj.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040210215513.Y35085@blues.jpj.net> X-PGP-Key: http://anders.fix.no/pgp/ X-PGP-Key-FingerPrint: 1E0F C53C D8DF 6A8F EAAD 19C5 D12A BC9F 0083 5956 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i cc: stan cc: FreeBSD Ports List Subject: Re: Problems (linux emulation?) building Openoffice 1.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 06:37:33 -0000 Hi, On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 10:07:05PM -0500, Trevor Johnson wrote: >> BTW, do you [know] where teh default "jail" for linux_base is? > Those messages have been causing a lot of questions. :( Would there be an > objection if I just removed them? Anders? Please try to install linux_base in a jail before you touch it. I see there seems to be something wrong about the patch I added, the message these users are seing should not be shown unless they have WITH_JAIL defined. I'll look into it and get it fixed. Cheers, -- Anders.