Date: Tue, 7 Nov 2006 10:03:08 +0200 From: Jonathan McKeown <jonathan@hst.org.za> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cacti -vs- mrtg Message-ID: <200611071003.08248.jonathan@hst.org.za> In-Reply-To: <a969fbd10611062348r5d20f08ic0ed015607a81299@mail.gmail.com> References: <a969fbd10611062348r5d20f08ic0ed015607a81299@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 09:48, Jeff Mohler wrote: > I can use MRTG, and have MRTG do what I want it to do. > > Id like to try cacti, but..am I alone in finding that it's a PITA? > > Im not trying to be negative, just looking for a reality check. > > I like the simplicity of mrtg, but I like the "go back in time" of > cacti to view performance data. I wasn't keen on cacti just because I have an irrational dislike of PHP. I installed cricket (written in Perl), which ISTR also takes a bit of wrestling to configure, but seems to work well enough. Jonathan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200611071003.08248.jonathan>