From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 25 13:07:30 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DBC106566B for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786128FC1A for ; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Su1JE-0004oc-HZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:07:24 -0700 Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 06:07:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1343221644538-5729739.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <20120725194717.550d0603@AMD620.ovitrap.com> References: <500FD659.4090106@my.gd> <20120725194717.550d0603@AMD620.ovitrap.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stable production version. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 13:07:30 -0000 8.3 or 9.1. Using 9.0 when 9.1 is behind the corner is going backwards IMHO. or 9-STABLE if you want your system evolving up to release, which is nice because you can catch and solve all possible problems one at the time, and not be overwhelmed upgrading only to RELEASE. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/FreeBSD-Stable-production-version-tp5729696p5729739.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com.