Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 10:20:17 +0300 From: Eygene Ryabinkin <rea-fbsd@codelabs.ru> To: miwi@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org, x11@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/132615: [patch] x11/libX11: work aroung parsing bug in Bash 4.0 Message-ID: <CNRvQuQsWjPceEprCAhye6Gtlm4@gaXtT4o8WV/C0Q%2BqaYA3hARX3do> In-Reply-To: <200903140956.n2E9uJ9G049103@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200903140956.n2E9uJ9G049103@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Good day. Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 09:56:19AM +0000, miwi@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Synopsis: [patch] x11/libX11: work aroung parsing bug in Bash 4.0 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: miwi > State-Changed-When: Sat Mar 14 09:56:19 UTC 2009 > State-Changed-Why: > close by submitter request. I had researched on the DOLT a little bit more and found that doltcompile greatly speeds up the compilation process, because it was written precisely for this purpose: http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2008/04/msg00286.html So, I would say that it's better to patch the doltcompile script itself rather than to drop support for it. Any views on this? -- Eygene _ ___ _.--. # \`.|\..----...-'` `-._.-'_.-'` # Remember that it is hard / ' ` , __.--' # to read the on-line manual )/' _/ \ `-_, / # while single-stepping the kernel. `-'" `"\_ ,_.-;_.-\_ ', fsc/as # _.-'_./ {_.' ; / # -- FreeBSD Developers handbook {_.-``-' {_/ #
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CNRvQuQsWjPceEprCAhye6Gtlm4>