Date: Fri, 02 Nov 2012 13:28:09 -0400 From: Mike Jakubik <mike.jakubik@intertainservices.com> To: Maxim Khitrov <max@mxcrypt.com> Cc: Bas Smeelen <b.smeelen@ose.nl>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Adam Strohl <adams-freebsd@ateamsystems.com> Subject: Re: SU+J on 9.1-RC2 ISO Message-ID: <1351877289.2657.3.camel@mjakubik.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <CAJcQMWcEdg3NXXe5Vhp3v7EgZiv0MKq_AMLDFNxgRY6SvKW8_Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <5093F934.7050306@ose.nl> <5093FD3D.3080201@ateamsystems.com> <1351876381.2657.1.camel@mjakubik.localdomain> <CAJcQMWcEdg3NXXe5Vhp3v7EgZiv0MKq_AMLDFNxgRY6SvKW8_Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 13:23 -0400, Maxim Khitrov wrote: > I don't think SU+J should even be an option in the installer as long > as this bug persists. If you don't use dump, go ahead and enable > journaling after the installation, but it's not a decision that new > users should be asked to make. This should not have been the default > in 9.0-RELEASE and I'm surprised to see that it's still not fixed in > 9.1. True, that would be in accordance with the FreeBSD POLA.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1351877289.2657.3.camel>