From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 8 22:05:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CC61065672 for ; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 22:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Received: from weak.local (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 896FD8FC17; Sun, 8 Jun 2008 22:05:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <484C5793.7020503@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 09 Jun 2008 00:05:07 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Macintosh/20080421) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eygene Ryabinkin References: <4839B2FD.8060401@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jun 2008 22:05:06 -0000 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Kris, good day. > > Sun, May 25, 2008 at 08:42:05PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> For the past few months some of my machines have reported at boot: >> >> cpu0: on acpi0 >> est0: on cpu0 >> est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. >> est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 722072206000722 >> device_attach: est0 attach returned 6 >> p4tcc0: on cpu0 >> cpu1: on acpi0 >> est1: on cpu1 >> est: CPU supports Enhanced Speedstep, but is not recognized. >> est: cpu_vendor GenuineIntel, msr 722072206000722 >> device_attach: est1 attach returned 6 >> p4tcc1: on cpu1 >> ... >> (for every CPU). >> >> They were not previously this verbose. What is going wrong? > > Any chance that you have upgraded your BIOS or modified ACPI tables? > This error message is present already for two years or so. What > CPUs do you have? I assume it is on -CURRENT? > > The message comes from sys/i386/cpufreq/est.c:1066, revision 1.16. > And your trouble most probably comes from est_acpi_info() that does > not return the list of frequencies. I am seeing this for the > dual-core Intel CPUs, but only the second core is not recognized, > the first one is OK. It is a number of different systems (dual 4-core xeon). They all appear to be working properly. Kris