From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 6 22:58:35 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29F716A469 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dieterich.joh@googlemail.com) Received: from hs-out-2122.google.com (hs-out-0708.google.com [64.233.178.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4844E13C4E1 for ; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 22:58:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dieterich.joh@googlemail.com) Received: by hs-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id j58so6070134hsj.11 for ; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:58:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=pTop/qmpF5I9OCI7ZJxIZbAog/yHvT2TQDvFngrJodk=; b=VTVpYZlbC2jU/tXU0OCtEbaV7gdOrByYWJ9BZqpIX4VYx9Db/xRNKkOLuzRPakA9769nUBH2tbEnptR+xOmQXBOZQPTKzLwqIdfQZBaOLQLiK2GMHYWbm4zXHLEAiJaCXEQD+VKnW5fi4FzU467HDoZNkFX9Yntliq3ElFgxaDQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=fI5zJnVU1DiNGOhqFu7Jh4lxoqXHHd/lZu1bihgOYmbEde7sEECnbnNpon29wB0ZlSapDSUASuYJWU02c/tY11paxkAZGF0CNyAgZQbgUY5qzgZd25pYmrHd1ZYMDvyPo/7tkK+MM4GMHJIETAtHMuqlTWYVkVejk5mQvDybtns= Received: by 10.150.96.10 with SMTP id t10mr5235909ybb.18.1199660314588; Sun, 06 Jan 2008 14:58:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.151.10.21 with HTTP; Sun, 6 Jan 2008 14:58:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <542798610801061458m2a878a9dj2d33065de3642236@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2008 23:58:33 +0100 From: "Johannes Dieterich" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20080106222040.GB67243@tirith.brixandersen.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <542798610801060556h28d300f2n4fdcf21d83d2213f@mail.gmail.com> <47813D8E.9080603@fsck.ch> <542798610801061326o63f731d5o32bef2eb2624f85e@mail.gmail.com> <20080106222040.GB67243@tirith.brixandersen.dk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: overheating Thinkpad X60s with 7.0-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:58:35 -0000 On 1/6/08, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 06, 2008 at 10:26:48PM +0100, Johannes Dieterich wrote: > > X and T series of the thinkpads are rather different, even the cores are > > completely different (I have a dualcore low-voltage version, I assume > > yours is running on a dual Pentium m, or?). > > FWIW, I haven't seen any temperature related issues on my ThinkPad > X60s, which has been tracking -CURRENT for the last year or so. > > It too has had the IPW3945 replaced by an Atheros wireless card, but > it is still using the original HDD. > > Can the HDD change already cause such a thing? Besides that: I have not configured anything myself concerning ACPI. Anyone any idea what/where/how to check? I DO think that the fan is working. I can hear it (and it does not sound ill) and it also shows in $ sysctl dev.acpi_ibm dev.acpi_ibm.0.%desc: IBM ThinkPad ACPI Extras dev.acpi_ibm.0.%driver: acpi_ibm dev.acpi_ibm.0.%location: handle=\_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.HKEY dev.acpi_ibm.0.%pnpinfo: _HID=IBM0068 _UID=0 dev.acpi_ibm.0.%parent: acpi0 dev.acpi_ibm.0.initialmask: 2060 dev.acpi_ibm.0.availmask: 16777215 dev.acpi_ibm.0.events: 0 dev.acpi_ibm.0.eventmask: 2060 dev.acpi_ibm.0.hotkey: 1443 dev.acpi_ibm.0.lcd_brightness: 0 dev.acpi_ibm.0.volume: 9 dev.acpi_ibm.0.mute: 0 dev.acpi_ibm.0.thinklight: 0 dev.acpi_ibm.0.bluetooth: 0 dev.acpi_ibm.0.wlan: 1 dev.acpi_ibm.0.fan_speed: 4071 dev.acpi_ibm.0.fan_level: 0 dev.acpi_ibm.0.fan: 1 dev.acpi_ibm.0.thermal: 62 61 -1 58 43 -1 40 -1 Now not being touched at all for an hour and just idling around. Besides it did work under 6.2 without problems, would be a crazy coincident if right with the update the fan broke. Any idea anyone? :S Thanks, Johannes