Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2008 14:47:11 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: Andrew D <andrewd@webzone.net.au> Cc: FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: always-interactive ports Message-ID: <492AA24F.7060403@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <492A9A63.4020505@webzone.net.au> References: <492A964B.1060103@icyb.net.ua> <492A9A63.4020505@webzone.net.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 24/11/2008 14:13 Andrew D said the following: > Andriy Gapon wrote: >> I wonder if we have any flag for always-interactive ports i.e. ports >> that prompt user for something regardless of all batch/interactivity >> options. One example is java/jdk* ports that prompt user for license >> acceptance. >> > > You will probably find this is for legal reasons. > >> If we don't have such a flag, maybe we should add one. >> >> One use, for instance, is to skip such ports for portupgrade --batch. >> > > Doing this could make fBSD liable which we certainly don't want. > I think that you did misunderstand what I asked and suggested. I am speaking about skipping the ports not the prompts. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?492AA24F.7060403>