From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Apr 2 1:10:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8390337B41B; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 01:10:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (arr@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g329AJE23700; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 04:10:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from arr@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: fledge.watson.org: arr owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 04:10:18 -0500 (EST) From: "Andrew R. Reiter" X-Sender: arr@fledge.watson.org To: Terry Lambert Cc: "Andrew R. Reiter" , Alfred Perlstein , smp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Where to initialize certain locks... In-Reply-To: <3CA974A8.5440F3C9@mindspring.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 2 Apr 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: :If you are going to complain about SYSINIT(), at least complain :about something like the bubble sort in init_main.c (so I can :dismiss it as a one-time operation that didn't need to be that :fast, compared to, say, not doing concurrent hardware probes :simultaneously for lack of a one-shot timer outcall mechanism). Dood, you're going way off track here. I was soley disliking the fact that I had my MTX_SYSINIT() macro have the sub and order arguments. I am not and was not complaining about SYSINIT(). -- Andrew R. Reiter arr@watson.org arr@FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message