From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Aug 21 20:45:57 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8F72EB5
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:45:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.24])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mx.sdf.org", Issuer "SDF.ORG" (not verified))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7B153588
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:45:57 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from otaku.freeshell.org (IDENT:case@otaku.freeshell.org
 [192.94.73.9])
 by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.8/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s7LKjNlv000143
 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256 bits) verified NO);
 Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:45:24 GMT
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:45:23 +0000 (UTC)
From: John Case <case@SDF.ORG>
X-X-Sender: case@faeroes.freeshell.org
To: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com>
Subject: Re: Did /nonexistent go away in FreeBSD 9 ?
In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y73eUgNPWpzjzwH_RuNXos8NiGSZV3_1Z7tBn80LKw6g0w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1408212044060.26741@faeroes.freeshell.org>
References: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1408192023410.7410@faeroes.freeshell.org>
 <53F59BD2.8010902@qeng-ho.org>
 <Pine.NEB.4.64.1408212027070.26741@faeroes.freeshell.org>
 <CAHu1Y73eUgNPWpzjzwH_RuNXos8NiGSZV3_1Z7tBn80LKw6g0w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Cc: FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 20:45:58 -0000


On Thu, 21 Aug 2014, Michael Sierchio wrote:

>> I removed the securelevel setting and it worked perfectly (the ssh tunnel).
>>
>> I have no idea why the securelevel setting would cause this...
>>
>> Any ideas ?  I would actually like to set securelevel=2, but I also need my
>> ssh tunnel to work ...
>
> What's the tunnel for? I.e., what sub-protocol are you using? scp? How
> are you authenticating?


It is sshuttle.  Super lightweight ssh tunnel app for creating a simple 
VPN.  Pretty stock, standard SSH tunnel.

Again, works perfectly if securelevel is off, complains about /nonexistent 
not being a real dir (and refuses to log in) if securelevel=2.