From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 27 18:41:23 2008
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EB7E1065674
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:41:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from outA.internet-mail-service.net (outA.internet-mail-service.net
	[216.240.47.224])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D19C8FC20
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:41:23 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from julian@elischer.org)
Received: from mx0.idiom.com (HELO idiom.com) (216.240.32.160)
	by out.internet-mail-service.net (qpsmtpd/0.40) with ESMTP;
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:41:22 -0800
Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by idiom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0134125E65;
	Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:41:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <47C5AEE2.9040708@elischer.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:41:38 -0800
From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Macintosh/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
References: <47C39948.3080907@elischer.org> <47C4BB96.80804@icir.org>
	<47C4E87B.8010403@elischer.org>
	<20080227092653.J94494@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
In-Reply-To: <20080227092653.J94494@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marko Zec <zec@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD Current <current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: warning of pending commit attempt.
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:41:23 -0000

Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Julian Elischer wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> would appear in all jails. I uses and expands on the jail infrastructure.
> 
> wait a sec, does that mean that it expands jails and jails will then
> be called "vimages"? Or will it still be possible to have jails inside
> a virtual instance?
> 

hmm i haven't actually tried a jail in a vimage, but it Should work I 
think. I just rebooted my vimage machine for some other work and need 
it for a while so I can't test it now..


just as there is an effective default jail for the base system, hter 
eis an effective 'default jail' for a vimage, there canbe others as well.
Note that vimages a nesteable,  and you can assign subsets of stuff 
between them in a nested manner as you would expect.

So a jail in a vimage would have to select one of the addressed 
assigned to that vimage for it to be able to work.. of course you
can assigne the same address to many vimages if they are on  separate 
disjoint unconnected networks. Something you can not do with jails 
alone. (for example).