From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 11 08:11:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9540116A4CE for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 08:11:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web54005.mail.yahoo.com (web54005.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2124F43D5F for ; Wed, 11 May 2005 08:11:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 28528 invoked by uid 60001); 11 May 2005 08:11:57 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=itWBlapBmwhEkZdSANeQyLCYPXVsXEa2WQ8q7IljQ0lWGFXvmmSD5zlWY9ft1Wb4EapX7LhERTFaa6RVb90yJkoiaaO1SPb2jhtNW4EW6J29AZ2sdunLiwAHWaLv96mkbDCRV7n011EAL/c+2sUiPB6RJymbX41rek4ayZl96tk= ; Message-ID: <20050511081157.28525.qmail@web54005.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [147.46.44.181] by web54005.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 11 May 2005 01:11:57 PDT Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 01:11:57 -0700 (PDT) From: Rob To: Subhro In-Reply-To: <4281B873.7020208@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: xl(4) & polling X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 08:11:58 -0000 --- Subhro wrote: > On 5/11/2005 13:13, Rob wrote: > > >--- Subhro wrote: > > > > > > > >>On 5/11/2005 8:04, Rob wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>All computers are running 5-Stable, as of May 10. > >>>All, but PC1 with fxp, use polling, with: > >>> options DEVICE_POLLING > >>> options HZ=1000 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>1000 IMHO seems a bit too heavy. Try something > >>lower. > > > > Same problem. Ssh-tunnel connection is also > > disrupted with HZ=100. May I conclude that the > > HZ value is not the culprit? Or should I try > > once again with HZ=10? > > > > > 100 should be fine. 10 would be a bit too much > overkill. > > >kern.ipc.nmbclusters is 4928 for this PC. > >Is that good or bad? > > > > > What is the purpose of the box? Give a description > of the network traffic. This is a lab in the Chemistry department; the box in question is a dual-homed gateway to eight other PCs in the lab. The box has a tight firewall, and runs an apache server and an SSH server. On the private network, the box also runs as a DHCP server, Samba server and NTP server. OS = 5-Stable. The other PCs in the lab are two FreeBSD PCs and various flavours of Windows. > Did you use any strange CFLAGS like -O3 or -f* > compile time options when you built the system? No. My /etc/make.conf has: CFLAGS= -O -pipe NOPROFILE=true NO_PF=true >> kern.polling.enable: 0 > > Force this to be 1. Damn I should have noted it > earlier I took this printout after I changed the value to 0. Of course it is 1 when I test the polling, but when I noticed that the ssh-tunnel connection problem persisted, I changed it to 0; so that my ssh-tunnel connection is not randomly closed :). Thanks for your elaborate help! Rob. __________________________________ Yahoo! Mail Mobile Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone. http://mobile.yahoo.com/learn/mail