From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Mar 1 3:35:26 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from viper.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB1C37BE9B; Wed, 1 Mar 2000 03:35:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com) Received: from ade by viper.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12Q7PM-0000xb-00; Wed, 01 Mar 2000 05:35:12 -0600 Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 05:35:12 -0600 From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gdk_imlib.5 Message-ID: <20000301053512.B3522@lovett.com> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1000229202231.2899U-100000@phelps.salk.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002292135450.88775-100000@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002292135450.88775-100000@hub.freebsd.org>; from kris@hub.freebsd.org on Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 09:40:42PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 09:40:42PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > This is especially annoying with things like GNOME which pump out new pico > revisions every alternate day, s/day/hour/, or so it seems at times :) > and which usually don't interoperate with > one another perfectly, Oh yes they do. Honest. Really. I mean it. Wanna buy a bridge? > so unless you are perfectly in sync you may have > problems. Blame GNOME for poor release engineering skills here :-( They're working on that. Though I'm already starting to have nightmares about GNOME 1.2 -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message