From owner-freebsd-ports  Wed Mar  1  3:35:26 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from viper.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id EAB1C37BE9B; Wed,  1 Mar 2000 03:35:13 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ade@lovett.com)
Received: from ade by viper.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 12Q7PM-0000xb-00; Wed, 01 Mar 2000 05:35:12 -0600
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2000 05:35:12 -0600
From: Ade Lovett <ade@lovett.com>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@hub.freebsd.org>
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gdk_imlib.5
Message-ID: <20000301053512.B3522@lovett.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1000229202231.2899U-100000@phelps.salk.edu> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002292135450.88775-100000@hub.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0002292135450.88775-100000@hub.freebsd.org>; from kris@hub.freebsd.org on Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 09:40:42PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Tue, Feb 29, 2000 at 09:40:42PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> 
> This is especially annoying with things like GNOME which pump out new pico
> revisions every alternate day,

s/day/hour/, or so it seems at times :)

> and which usually don't interoperate with
> one another perfectly,

Oh yes they do.  Honest.  Really.  I mean it.  Wanna buy a bridge?

> so unless you are perfectly in sync you may have
> problems. Blame GNOME for poor release engineering skills here :-(

They're working on that.  Though I'm already starting to have
nightmares about GNOME 1.2

-aDe

-- 
Ade Lovett, Austin, TX.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message