Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2014 21:05:51 -0500 From: Adam Vande More <amvandemore@gmail.com> To: John <aqqa11@earthlink.net> Cc: FreeBSD questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: where does uname get version number? Message-ID: <CA%2BtpaK2c4HmH%2BF%2B5APg8OLhKiSg1%2BvpRDrt%2B7Rz3pPvwV7EvJQ@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <28442154.1397839875163.JavaMail.root@mswamui-backed.atl.sa.earthlink.net> References: <28442154.1397839875163.JavaMail.root@mswamui-backed.atl.sa.earthlink.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 11:51 AM, John <aqqa11@earthlink.net> wrote: > > > Thanks for the clarification! I don't compile kernel, I only installed > 9.0-RELEASE and binary upgraded to 9.2-RELEASE using freebsd-update. (I'm > worried about the lifetime of the SSD in my laptop so am trying to avoid > compiling, but that's a side topic.) > > I now totally deleted /usr/src (and /usr/obj), because I don't need them > now as I now install virtualbox from pkg. > > But after rebooting, "uname -a" still shows 9.1-RELEASE. As mentioned > before, all files such as kernel etc are in 9.2, where does uname get that > incorrect version now? > I am a bit confused how 9.0-RELEASE came into the picture. Can you show the output of top -n? -- Adam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2BtpaK2c4HmH%2BF%2B5APg8OLhKiSg1%2BvpRDrt%2B7Rz3pPvwV7EvJQ>