From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 31 21:50:54 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0109A16A4CE; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:50:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lakermmtao07.cox.net (lakermmtao07.cox.net [68.230.240.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3627A43D1D; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:50:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Received: from dolphin.local.net ([68.11.31.246]) by lakermmtao07.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP <20050331215052.HGUZ19214.lakermmtao07.cox.net@dolphin.local.net>; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 16:50:52 -0500 Received: from dolphin.local.net (localhost.local.net [127.0.0.1]) by dolphin.local.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j2VLoplJ038140; Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:50:51 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from conrads@cox.net) Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:50:46 -0600 From: "Conrad J. Sabatier" To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20050331155046.21a5d323@dolphin.local.net> In-Reply-To: <20050331203915.GH1687@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <790a9fff050331080572081eb6@mail.gmail.com> <2fd864e05033109061a68554d@mail.gmail.com> <20050331203915.GH1687@dragon.NUXI.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; amd64-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Working and broken Linux ports on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 21:50:54 -0000 On Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:39:15 -0800, "David O'Brien" wrote: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 09:06:43AM -0800, Astrodog wrote: > > Long term.... Perhaps a > > Linux32 and Linux64 dep? Not sure. Anyone have thoughts on that? I > > know its been discussed before, but I don't think a resolution ever > > came out of it. > > No. There will only be /compat/linux. No linux32 or linux64 > versions. Sometime in the future the linux_base port will be larger > (ie, contain 64-bit objects also). The 64-bit things will live in the > places specified by the Linux LSB spec. > > > For now, I'm > > going to go with the assumption that there will be /compat/linux32 > > and linux64. If this has been resolved, let me know so I can make > > the ports fix I'm gonna work on reflect that. > > For right now, add amd64 to 'ONLY_FOR_ARCHS'. And add any of the rest > of the below that is needed: > > .if (${ARCH} == "amd64") > ARCH= i386 > FALLBACK_ELF_MIB= kern.elf32.fallback_brand > RPMFLAGS+= --noscripts > .endif > > Doesn't anyone read the ports' Makefile any more?? I already see one linux port for which the above additions are insufficient, namely, graphics/linux-jpeg: PORTNAME= jpeg PORTVERSION= 6b.15 PORTREVISION= 3 CATEGORIES= graphics linux MAINTAINER= freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org COMMENT= RPM of the JPEG lib RPM_SET= libjpeg-6b-15.${MACHINE_ARCH}.rpm ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ .include "../../x11-toolkits/linux-gtk/Makefile" -- Conrad J. Sabatier -- "In Unix veritas"