From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Jan 16 16:14:17 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id QAA24372 for questions-outgoing; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 16:14:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailhub.aros.net (mailhub.aros.net [207.173.16.17]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id QAA24364 for ; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 16:14:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from fluffy.aros.net (fluffy.aros.net [207.173.16.2]) by mailhub.aros.net (8.8.4/Unknown) with ESMTP id RAA19074; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 17:14:07 -0700 (MST) Received: from fluffy.aros.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fluffy.aros.net (8.8.4/8.6.12) with ESMTP id RAA05411; Thu, 16 Jan 1997 17:14:05 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <199701170014.RAA05411@fluffy.aros.net> To: David Lowe cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: anyone tried INN shared active patch? In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 16 Jan 1997 13:10:53 PST." Date: Thu, 16 Jan 1997 17:14:05 -0700 From: Dave Andersen Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I've recently installed INN 1.4unoff4 on a FreeBSD-2.2-BETA Pentium 133 > with 128 MB RAM. In testing out various options I unearthed a little > patch which causes it to use System V shared memory to reduce the size of > each in.nnrpd process. It's called the sharedactive patch. You may need to do some kernel reconfigurations to make it work - namely increasing the size of the SysV shared pages: options "SHMMAXPGS=2048" (the value we use here) > I'm wondering if anyone else has run into problems using this patch > specifically, or more generally with FreeBSD's implementation of System V > shared memory. We've been running it for about 8 months here. It's marvelous. -Dave