From owner-freebsd-current  Wed Sep  9 04:42:15 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id EAA28865
          for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 04:42:15 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from godzilla.zeta.org.au (godzilla.zeta.org.au [203.15.68.22])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id EAA28841
          for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 9 Sep 1998 04:42:12 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from bde@godzilla.zeta.org.au)
Received: (from bde@localhost)
	by godzilla.zeta.org.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA21118;
	Wed, 9 Sep 1998 21:41:46 +1000
Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 21:41:46 +1000
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Message-Id: <199809091141.VAA21118@godzilla.zeta.org.au>
To: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no, tmb@rcru.rl.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [LONG PATCH] Re: 2048-byte sector support for DOS filesystem.
Cc: bde@zeta.org.au, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>Thanks for clearing that up for me. So in summary, the od/scsi-related patches
>in kern-7210 are superceded by the CAM work, but the msdosfs-related patches
>are still meant to be applied if you want this 2048-byte block functionality in
>msdosfs.

Not quite.  The od-2048-byte-block-related patches in kern/7210 are
superseded by old work in the slice code.  The other od-related patches
are hopefully superseded by CAM work.

Bruce

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message