From owner-freebsd-hackers  Tue Jan 30 15:49:42 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA20230
          for hackers-outgoing; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 15:49:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from schizo.cdsnet.net (schizo.cdsnet.net [204.118.244.32])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA20219
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 15:49:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mrcpu@localhost) by schizo.cdsnet.net (8.6.12/8.6.12) id PAA13034; Tue, 30 Jan 1996 15:50:21 -0800
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 1996 15:50:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Jaye Mathisen <mrcpu@cdsnet.net>
To: hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Maybe bug in fsetpos?
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960130154850.13011A-100000@schizo.cdsnet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk



On the BSD/OS list there's mention of a wrong type to the second 
parameter in the fsetpos function.

I didn't look at it, but in FreeBSD it's a long, and the BSD/OS patch 
makes it a quad_t or something like that.  

My question is if the parameter is wrong in freebsd's fsetpos.c...