From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 6 07:46:25 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE856106564A; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:46:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bpurgar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572F48FC0C; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so4451971gxk.13 for ; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:46:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=IBpxInr3LWwDbAkuiJ5J8tfXEUGiAxicDJ2ELjd+Ha4=; b=nBeNXAoRyilq/mvGXkvjuk8r+Wug7RYwamzJRsNSsW26VWg/yeeU6OplUW61R5ZNWC xgZ15XDYn1Ff5kG9hp331RAIjbU9mCTMRXh8TCJFqO2VHCsZVe1WsnZRVE4hG+VxAlP4 DH3syQT4+VUw09yqz9tAgxNCYMkmAz36jESdk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.16.202 with SMTP id i10mr394312pbd.5.1315295184209; Tue, 06 Sep 2011 00:46:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.49.6 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:46:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:46:24 +0200 Message-ID: From: Berislav Purgar To: Adrian Chadd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ath 802.11n ampdutx progress ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Sep 2011 07:46:25 -0000 On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 7:08 AM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > .. I think I've found/fixed the current BAW tracking bug. > There's more to go, but this should eliminate the obviously broken > case I introduced in an earlier commit. > Please try the latest code in my if_ath_tx branch and let me know. :) > > > Adrian > Hi .. no .. i see these messages only when i produce high traffic .. i just download latest code of if_ath_tx branch. for now i can tell that is OK but i will test more.. tnx Adrian :)