From owner-cvs-all Tue May 22 16:52:34 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from meow.osd.bsdi.com (meow.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE1A37B42C; Tue, 22 May 2001 16:52:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (john@jhb-laptop.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.241]) by meow.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f4MNqJG68149; Tue, 22 May 2001 16:52:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20010522233911.4E1013E2C@bazooka.unixfreak.org> Date: Tue, 22 May 2001 16:54:05 -0700 (PDT) From: John Baldwin To: Dima Dorfman Subject: Re: cvs commit: CVSROOT cfg.pm Cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, Josef Karthauser Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 22-May-01 Dima Dorfman wrote: > Josef Karthauser writes: >> joe 2001/05/22 16:18:11 PDT >> >> Modified files: >> . cfg.pm >> Log: >> Revert to the previous behaviour of not sending mail on directory >> creation. >> >> Note to FreeBSD committers: do we want this on? > > I don't think it's a very good idea. Think of ports. People already > don't like that there are two commits for every new port (the port > itself and CVSROOT/modules); this would raise that number to three or > four (the dir(s) for the port, the port, and modules). What if it was just for the other trees then and not ports? -- John Baldwin -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message