From owner-freebsd-ports  Thu Sep 30 15:13:56 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mail-green.research.att.com (H-135-207-30-103.research.att.com [135.207.30.103])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB49414C20
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 15:13:45 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from fenner@research.att.com)
Received: from alliance.research.att.com (alliance.research.att.com [135.207.26.26])
	by mail-green.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A40201E018; Thu, 30 Sep 1999 18:13:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from windsor.research.att.com (windsor.research.att.com [135.207.26.46])
	by alliance.research.att.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA19971;
	Thu, 30 Sep 1999 18:13:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Bill Fenner <fenner@research.att.com>
Received: (from fenner@localhost)
	by windsor.research.att.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.5) id PAA28134;
	Thu, 30 Sep 1999 15:13:43 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199909302213.PAA28134@windsor.research.att.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: reg@shale.csir.co.za
Subject: Re: Bad interaction between libtool version check and patches
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
References:  <199909272040.NAA69605@mango.attlabs.att.com> <19990930003241.E35653@shale.csir.co.za>
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 1999 15:13:42 -0700
Versions: dmail (solaris) 2.2e/makemail 2.8u
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


>Does this fix your problem?

It looks like it would (I don't really want to figure out how to install
an old libtool to find out).  I'd rather see a more elegant solution,
but since this isn't something that happens often I suppose the easy
brute force solution is sufficient.

  Bill


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message