From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Dec  7 15:21:26 1995
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA02253
          for questions-outgoing; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 15:21:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.211])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA02222
          Thu, 7 Dec 1995 15:21:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA07409; Thu, 7 Dec 1995 16:13:30 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199512072313.QAA07409@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Any operational code using mmap() on FreeBSD ?
To: davidg@root.com
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 1995 16:13:30 -0700 (MST)
Cc: terry@lambert.org, root@buffnet.net, jau@jau.csc.fi, questions@freebsd.org,
        hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <199512072217.OAA06221@corbin.Root.COM> from "David Greenman" at Dec 7, 95 02:17:20 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> >The question is what are the failure modes on 2.1.  If there aren't any,
> >you should upgrade to resolve the problem.  If there are, and they are
> >more severe, you should report them to be corrected, since 2.1 *is*
> >being maintained (in the form of the 2.2-current).
> 
>    Uh, actually, 2.1 is being maintained seperately from 2.2-current.

Really?!?

Man, I thought that there was an announcement saying there wouldn't be
a 2.1.1.  Not the first time I've been wrong...


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.