From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Apr 4 11:21:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.22.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C66637B420; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:21:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by mail.rpi.edu (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id g34JLabY439718; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 14:21:36 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20020404095320.GB4598@submonkey.net> References: <20020404005838.P60053-100000@patrocles.silby.com> <20020404011807.GC93977@madman.nectar.cc> <20020404095320.GB4598@submonkey.net> Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 14:21:35 -0500 To: Ceri , "Jacques A. Vidrine" From: Garance A Drosihn Subject: Re: Heads up, a bit: ephemeral port range changes Cc: Mike Silbersack , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.3 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:53 AM +0100 4/4/02, Ceri wrote: >On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 07:18:07PM -0600, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > > You don't need the old kernel, anyway. You can just use the > > sysctl knobs. > >Any reason why we can't just say that in UPDATING, and then the >few who do have problems (and I think it will be few) have an >instant fix in UPDATING while they get their firewall sorted out ? I think that if the sysctl's are included in UPDATING, then it sounds reasonable to MFC this change into -stable. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message