Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:19:00 +0300
From:      Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
To:        Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com>
Cc:        Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com>, Pedro Giffuni <pfg@FreeBSD.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-toolchain@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: lang/gcc6-aux for head beyond __nonnull related issues: vm_ooffset_t and vm_pindex_t related changes (and more)
Message-ID:  <20170720061900.GF1935@kib.kiev.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20170719220613.38149073@kan>
References:  <E54E495A-E4C8-40B3-B1E8-133A9872B6B2@dsl-only.net> <9758023E-1526-41F9-9416-6AC8AD3201B5@dsl-only.net> <E86AC2D1-EE2D-4E33-85FD-8069B050421F@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.LNX.2.21.1704150928320.4604@anthias.pfeifer.com> <20170414201952.69ccc472@kan> <alpine.LSU.2.21.1707192248390.5621@anthias.pfeifer.com> <20170719220613.38149073@kan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:06:13PM -0400, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jul 2017 22:50:04 +0200 (CEST)
> Gerald Pfeifer <gerald@pfeifer.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, 14 Apr 2017, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
> > > it was suggested multiple times that the whole fixinc step is
> > > ultimately harmful and serves no useful purpose and probably should
> > > be disabled in built packages outright. Is there a reason not to do
> > > it? Even Redhat appears to do the slimming in their rpms:  
> > 
> > For the more current lang/gcc* ports (not the gcc5-aux and gcc6-aux 
> > ports which I do not maintain) I have now removed packaging the
> > headers processed by fixincludes, so any problems in that direction
> > should be gone.
> > 
> > Gerald
> 
> Thank you, Gerald!

This is very good news, thank you.  Gcc should be much more usable now.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170720061900.GF1935>