Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2019 16:57:15 +0300 From: Maxim Filimonov <che@bein.link> To: Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@gmx.com> Cc: Ernie Luzar <luzar722@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipsec+gre: no luck accessing a jail Message-ID: <AC1041C5-DCFE-4781-B8FF-D5E36023EE07@bein.link> In-Reply-To: <c09ef65e-cf72-705a-3f8e-7a5685f9b519@gmx.com> References: <a7443085f703fe099114bc86e7ddb60b@bein.link> <5C573C85.1080101@gmail.com> <6ECEFDEA-2A77-432E-88E4-8123356C2362@bein.link> <c09ef65e-cf72-705a-3f8e-7a5685f9b519@gmx.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>=20 > But if using both without DNS and hostnames *is* ok, would't that make > it a different problem? that lies probably within nginx or DNS? Wait a second, how can this be a problem with dns if the host resolves = correctly? How can that be a problem with nginx if the packages don't reach it? wbr, Maxim Filimonov che@bein.link > On 4 Feb 2019, at 15:01, Nikos Vassiliadis <nvass@gmx.com> wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 > On 2/3/19 9:53 PM, Maxim Filimonov wrote: >> If I'm not using GRE or anything, the jail is accessible via the = host's hostname/IP address. >> If I'm using GRE, but not IPSEC, it's available as well. >> If I'm using both, it's still accessible via its ip address, but not = through the host's hostname. >=20 > But if using both without DNS and hostnames *is* ok, would't that make > it a different problem? that lies probably within nginx or DNS? >=20 >> It's FreeBSD 11.2-RELEASE with the latest patches. >> If I'm not looking at the host nginx, everything else works like a = charm. >=20 > Exactly. >=20
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?AC1041C5-DCFE-4781-B8FF-D5E36023EE07>