From owner-freebsd-stable Thu Feb 22 13:56:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from kant.nihilist.org (kant.nihilist.org [64.6.198.184]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C5037B491 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:56:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tcole@nihilist.org) Received: from nietzsche.nihilist.org (nietzsche.nihilist.org [192.168.1.5]) by kant.nihilist.org (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1MLulV25140; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:56:47 -0800 (PST) Received: (from tcole@localhost) by nietzsche.nihilist.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f1MLuhS96374; Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:56:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tcole) Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:56:43 -0800 From: Travis Cole To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Donn Miller , George.Giles@mcmail.vanderbilt.edu, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Xserver won't start Message-ID: <20010222135643.A92188@nihilist.org> References: <20010221194958.A41180@telocity.com> <20010221210050.G66731@mollari.cthul.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010221210050.G66731@mollari.cthul.hu>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:00:50PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:00:50PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Don't do this; install the Xwrapper port instead -- the setuid bit was > removed from the XFree86 in favour of the Xwrapper port for a reason > (improved security). So why not make the XFree86-4 port depend on Xwrapper so confusion like this can be avoided? -- -Travis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message