From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 10 23:00:29 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD81716A40A for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from msrv.matik.com.br (msrv.matik.com.br [200.152.83.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F5013C474 for ; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:00:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) Received: from anc ([200.152.88.34]) by msrv.matik.com.br (8.13.8/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1AN0QIT012047; Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:00:26 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from joao@matik.com.br) From: JoaoBR Organization: Infomatik To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, spil.oss@gmail.com Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 21:00:09 -0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.4 References: <5fbf03c20702021132y5f931f5esdeab22d0048fa5a6@mail.gmail.com> <45C9A73C.1020409@gmail.com> <5fbf03c20702101108p686ed116n90fbdf26308f0e55@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5fbf03c20702101108p686ed116n90fbdf26308f0e55@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200702102100.11768.joao@matik.com.br> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88.4, clamav-milter version 0.88.4 on msrv.matik.com.br X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Michael Subject: Re: Problems with IPv6-less kernel and world X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 23:00:29 -0000 On Saturday 10 February 2007 17:08, Spil Oss wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Well, actually I'm proposing a change to the GENERIC kernel and > make.conf.example to add to the comment that one should add > WITHOUT_IPV6 to the make.conf if you enable NO_INET6. > > That sounds to me like something completely different than contacting > all port-maintainers. > even if ipv6 is a real situation it is not the standard, ipv4 is, then, eve= n=20 if ipv6 is some network's standard it is not a global standard, ipv4 is certainly then, it makes no sense that ipv6 is the default, neither for=20 applications nor for the kernel also certain then is that ipv6 is an ADDITIONAL option and who wants it, ne= eds=20 to enable it, either for applications as for the kernel, not the inverse=20 situation as today but this is not only a FBSD wiredness but a general confusion ... but so far as it matters to FBSD it is funny how many core/OS parts simply= =20 ignore NO_INET6 even if set ...=20 =2D-=20 Jo=E3o A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.br