From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Mar  6 17:44:15 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953E416A4CE
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  6 Mar 2004 17:44:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A7243D2D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
	Sat,  6 Mar 2004 17:44:15 -0800 (PST)	(envelope-from scrappy@hub.org)
Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4B48A35540; Sat,  6 Mar 2004 21:44:16 -0400 (AST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 487EF342A1; Sat,  6 Mar 2004 21:44:16 -0400 (AST)
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 21:44:16 -0400 (AST)
From: "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To: Phil Kernick <Phil@Kernick.org>
In-Reply-To: <404A7C42.1010301@Kernick.org>
Message-ID: <20040306214328.A13247@ganymede.hub.org>
References: <20040306130937.N71806@ganymede.hub.org>
	<20040306210515.M13247@ganymede.hub.org>
	<20040306212430.F13247@ganymede.hub.org>
	<404A7C42.1010301@Kernick.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Odd network issue ... *very* slow scp between two servers
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code
	<freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Mar 2004 01:44:15 -0000

On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Phil Kernick wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > Wow, okay, switching to 10baseT/UTP, full duplex is atrocious too:
> >
> > 1038785 bytes received in 74.30 seconds (13.65 KB/s)
> >
> > So, bug with full-duplex on the em devices?
>
> More likely to be a problem with the network card.
>
> # ifconfig em0
> em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>          options=3<rxcsum,txcsum>
>          inet X.X.X.X netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast X.X.X.X
>          ether 00:07:e9:0f:ea:2e
>          media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex>)
>          status: active
>
> # Name    Mtu Network       Address              Ipkts Ierrs    Opkts Oerrs  Coll
> em0    1500 <Link#1>    00:07:e9:0f:ea:2e  7668536     0  6071661     0     0

what version of FreeBSD are you running right now?  Updated to what date?
the one thought I had was that I picked a bad CVSup date and got an
transient bug in the driver ... ?


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664