Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 6 Mar 2004 21:44:16 -0400 (AST)
From:      "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
To:        Phil Kernick <Phil@Kernick.org>
Cc:        freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Odd network issue ... *very* slow scp between two servers
Message-ID:  <20040306214328.A13247@ganymede.hub.org>
In-Reply-To: <404A7C42.1010301@Kernick.org>
References:  <20040306130937.N71806@ganymede.hub.org> <20040306210515.M13247@ganymede.hub.org> <20040306212430.F13247@ganymede.hub.org> <404A7C42.1010301@Kernick.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, 7 Mar 2004, Phil Kernick wrote:

> Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> > Wow, okay, switching to 10baseT/UTP, full duplex is atrocious too:
> >
> > 1038785 bytes received in 74.30 seconds (13.65 KB/s)
> >
> > So, bug with full-duplex on the em devices?
>
> More likely to be a problem with the network card.
>
> # ifconfig em0
> em0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
>          options=3<rxcsum,txcsum>
>          inet X.X.X.X netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast X.X.X.X
>          ether 00:07:e9:0f:ea:2e
>          media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseTX <full-duplex>)
>          status: active
>
> # Name    Mtu Network       Address              Ipkts Ierrs    Opkts Oerrs  Coll
> em0    1500 <Link#1>    00:07:e9:0f:ea:2e  7668536     0  6071661     0     0

what version of FreeBSD are you running right now?  Updated to what date?
the one thought I had was that I picked a bad CVSup date and got an
transient bug in the driver ... ?


----
Marc G. Fournier           Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy@hub.org           Yahoo!: yscrappy              ICQ: 7615664



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040306214328.A13247>