From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Oct 30 18:21:59 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA02539 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:21:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.210.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA02513; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:21:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom by misery.sdf.com with smtp (Exim 1.73 #1) id 0xR6ge-0002E6-00; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:19:48 -0800 Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:19:45 -0800 (PST) From: Tom To: "Brian J. McGovern" cc: questions@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Win 95 PPP faster than pppd? In-Reply-To: <199710302312.SAA04687@spoon.beta.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 30 Oct 1997, Brian J. McGovern wrote: > The FreeBSD boxes managed about 8.26 K/s. The modem DTE port > was saturated at 115200bps +/- 20bps . > > The Win95 box managed about 10.5 K/s. Again, the DTE port on the modem > was saturated at 115200bps +/- 20bps. Try turning the tcp extensions off. rfc1323 is well known for bloating traffic on p2p links, because it can make vj header compression ineffective. Tom