From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Nov  5 12:49:09 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0A8106566B
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Nov 2010 12:49:09 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B89B8FC08
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Fri,  5 Nov 2010 12:49:09 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
	id 2CF0756026; Fri,  5 Nov 2010 12:32:35 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 12:32:35 +0000
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Message-ID: <20101105123235.GA12899@lonesome.com>
References: <20101102061418.GA1884@current.Sisis.de>
	<20101102193250.GU81149@hoeg.nl>
	<20101105073430.GA2765@current.Sisis.de>
	<86wros3rt2.fsf@gmail.com> <20101105120906.GD2054@hoeg.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20101105120906.GD2054@hoeg.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: Anonymous <swell.k@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: utmpx
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 12:49:09 -0000

On Fri, Nov 05, 2010 at 01:09:06PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote:
> It should be noted that that list is a bit pessimistic, since various
> ports have been fixed in the mean time.

Updates welcomed :-)

mcl