From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Mar 30 0:19:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from axl.ops.uunet.co.za (axl.ops.uunet.co.za [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A4A37B95F for ; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 00:19:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.ops.uunet.co.za) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.ops.uunet.co.za) by axl.ops.uunet.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1) id 12aaAZ-000OQv-00; Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:19:11 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/emulators/vmware2 Makefile ports/emulators/vmware2/files Hints.FreeBSD Makefile.vmmon README.FreeBSD md5 vmware.sh ports/emulators/vmware2/pkg MESSAGE PLIST ports/emulators/vmware2/scripts extract In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:13:53 +0900." <864s9odge6.wl@archon.local.idaemons.org> Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 10:19:11 +0200 Message-ID: <93924.954404351@axl.ops.uunet.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 30 Mar 2000 17:13:53 +0900, "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" wrote: > Hmm. Only one month or less has been passed since VMware 2.0 was > released. I've been thinking I should keep maintaining the older > version for those who would not upgrade their purchased VMware 1.1 > license to 2.0, and also thinking that there are still something left > for VMware 1.1 port. Aha! That's the issue I hadn't considered that makes numbered port directories necessary. Unnecessarily numbered port directories are a pet hate of mine. I see that it's necessary in this case. Thanks for putting my mind at ease. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message