From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Oct 7 19:37:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2801D37B401 for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:37:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au (bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au [130.102.2.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F2A43E6A for ; Mon, 7 Oct 2002 19:37:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from csmith@its.uq.edu.au) Received: from [130.102.152.68] (tobermory.its.uq.edu.au [130.102.152.68]) by bunyip.cc.uq.edu.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA10490 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2002 12:37:16 +1000 (GMT+1000) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309 Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2002 12:37:05 +1000 Subject: Use MFS for /tmp, etc ? From: Christopher Smith To: Message-ID: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG What's the consensus for using an MFS filesystem for places like /tmp. /var/tmp, /var/run, etc ? I see in some oldish postings to -questions this is considered a bad idea, does this still apply in more recent versions of FreeBSD (4.6.2) ? -- +- Christopher Smith, Systems Administrator ------------------------------+ | Server & Security Group, Information Technology Services | | The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 4072 | +- Ph +61 7 3365 4046 | email csmith@its.uq.edu.au | Fax +61 7 3365 4065 -+ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message