Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2006 14:02:09 -0700 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: mjacob@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CAM_NEW_TRAN changes-next set of changes ready for review Message-ID: <4547B9D1.6060201@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20061031115204.Y21918@ns1.feral.com> References: <7579f7fb0610281854l3ec600d7kf0a2cdf20fdcb838@mail.gmail.com> <7579f7fb0610282210p59de2123g379f0d4069bd1e42@mail.gmail.com> <45443C7F.5040508@samsco.org> <7579f7fb0610300801x4650cb3fgb93f662fbf7b4213@mail.gmail.com> <20061031115204.Y21918@ns1.feral.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mjacob@freebsd.org wrote: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~mjacob/DIFFS.CAM_NEW_TRAN_CODE > > This is the complete set of changes that remove the non-NEW_TRAN code > from the kernel and also does the minimal fixes to camlib and camcontrol > to accomodate the changes (it's just not practical to support old/new > simultaneously). > > I did a somewhat halfhearted run through /usr/ports trying to find > Makefile and patches that depended on CAM. That turned out to be a > fairly short list: > > /usr/ports/audio/cdparanoia > /usr/ports/audio/sound-juicer > /usr/ports/audio/xmcd > /usr/ports/emulators/mtools > /usr/ports/misc/mtx > /usr/ports/multimedia/k9copy > > I *think* based upon scanning them that only cdparanoia would have to > *really* be recompiled- in fact, it just an XPT_PATH_INQ, so it might > even get away from having to be recompiled. > > Any glaring omissions? > > -matt > I think that there are some GNOME and KDE apps that also might be affected. You can always pass a patch off to the ports team (portmgr) and ask them to do a trial run with it. They are always very open to that; better to have everything fixed ahead of time than to deal with things suddenly breaking. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4547B9D1.6060201>