From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 03:29:39 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0332216A41F; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:29:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from ameno.mahoroba.org (gw4.mahoroba.org [218.45.22.175]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8F1E43D66; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:29:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Received: from kasuga.mahoroba.org (IDENT:0BldPN6dFXviH5Aw0vW4EmN3REUrc8mAOeYq/ICdw/q1v1C1l8AQRMW1m+ZEb/fM@kasuga-iwi.mahoroba.org [IPv6:3ffe:501:185b:8010:212:f0ff:fe52:6ac]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0) by ameno.mahoroba.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP/inet6 id jAN3TOIR037552 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:29:28 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:29:23 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: Nate Lawson In-Reply-To: <43837A34.1030900@root.org> References: <4377775B.3080606@pldrouin.net> <20051114105854.GA1041@galgenberg.net> <4378CC14.2020109@pldrouin.net> <437A3901.8010001@pldrouin.net> <437A3B96.4040300@root.org> <437B42C0.9040605@pldrouin.net> <437CAEB0.9060202@pldrouin.net> <43837A34.1030900@root.org> User-Agent: xcite1.38> Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Sanj=F2?=) APEL/10.6 Emacs/22.0.50 (i386-unknown-freebsd6.0) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE X-PGP-Key: http://www.imasy.or.jp/~ume/publickey.asc X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1F00 0B9E 2164 70FC 6DC5 BF5F 04E9 F086 BF90 71FE Organization: Internet Mutual Aid Society, YOKOHAMA MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (ameno.mahoroba.org [IPv6:3ffe:501:185b:8010::1]); Wed, 23 Nov 2005 12:29:30 +0900 (JST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on ameno.mahoroba.org Cc: Pierre-Luc Drouin , acpi@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Performance problem since updating from 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0-STABLE last friday X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 03:29:39 -0000 Hi, >>>>> On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 12:06:12 -0800 >>>>> Nate Lawson said: nate> Thank you for tracking this down. It is interesting that BIF is nate> heavyweight while BST is not. I guess that is expected behavior by OEMs nate> which only test on Windows and so not everyone makes BIF simple. On my nate> laptops, BIF is as fast as BST. You are welcome. My laptops are also fast enough for BIF. I remembered that iwasaki-san grouched at the heavyweight of BIF when he was writing cmbat support. nate> I don't like the patch approach (changing the API), however. Let me nate> look at it and commit a fix that doesn't change the API. Yes, I didn't feel satisfaction with my patch, too. So, I anticipated that you say so. :-) Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/