From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 3 12:26:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72F6B1065670; Mon, 3 May 2010 12:26:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB9E8FC1D; Mon, 3 May 2010 12:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (unknown [92.116.41.197]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D58F08A1C42; Mon, 3 May 2010 14:26:51 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4BDEC107.6060204@bsdforen.de> Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 14:26:47 +0200 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100331 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?UTF-8?B?IkMuIEJlcmdzdHLDtm0i?= References: <4BDD28E2.8010201@rawbw.com> <20100503092213.GA1294@straylight.m.ringlet.net> <4BDEA78F.90303@pathscale.com> In-Reply-To: <4BDEA78F.90303@pathscale.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: yuri@rawbw.com, Andrius Mork??nas , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GSoC: Making ports work with clang X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 May 2010 12:26:55 -0000 On 03/05/2010 12:38, "C. Bergström" wrote: > What's really the goal here? In my opinion it's about staying away from the GPLv3. According to my understanding of the situation, GPLv3 code is not accepted into the project and that means we're stuck with gcc 4.2, which has already reached its EOL. The way I see it we /desperately/ need a new compiler for the base system. Having GPLv3 stuff in Ports is all right, so getting the base system to compile was the most important step. Now that it does I think the change should be made as soon as all the supported architectures work with clang. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?