From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 10 20:23:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF1616A4CF for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:23:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from vette.gigo.com (vette.gigo.com [216.218.228.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 243EF43FE5 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:23:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from lioux@brturbo.com) Received: from 200.101.111.208 (200-101-111-208.bsace705.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [200.101.111.208]) by vette.gigo.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 572B154B4 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:23:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 32098 invoked by uid 1001); 11 Nov 2003 04:14:43 -0000 Message-ID: <20031111041443.32097.qmail@exxodus.fedaykin.here> Received: (qmail 22108 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2003 23:17:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 10 Nov 2003 23:17:36 -0000 Received: from pop3.uol.com.br by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5) for lioux-freebsd@localhost (single-drop); Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:17:14 -0200 (BRST) Received: from peart.uol.com.br (172.26.5.218) by mtauol7.mail.sys.intranet (5.1.071) id 3EDB5C0C020CB8E3 for lioux-freebsd@uol.com.br; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:04:20 -0300 Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by storm5.uol.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CBB6CCE0 for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:04:19 -0200 (BRST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5F98562DE for ; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:04:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-ports-committers@FreeBSD.org) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A186016A4FD; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:04:16 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: lioux@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538) id 1405416A4D0; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:04:16 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: ports-committers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF6216A4CE; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:03:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from heechee.tobez.org (heechee.tobez.org [217.157.39.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5669F43F85; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 15:03:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tobez@tobez.org) Received: by heechee.tobez.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 337A7175D1; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:03:40 +0100 (CET) From: Anton Berezin To: Joe Marcus Clarke Mail-Followup-To: Anton Berezin , Joe Marcus Clarke , Kris Kennaway , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org References: <20031110183803.GA13613@xor.obsecurity.org> <20031110192311.GC31579@heechee.tobez.org> <20031110221218.GA15154@xor.obsecurity.org> <1068503254.725.79.camel@gyros> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1068503254.725.79.camel@gyros> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: owner-ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org cc: ports-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/lang/perl5.8 Makefile pkg-plist X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 04:23:21 -0000 X-Original-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 00:03:40 +0100 X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2003 04:23:21 -0000 On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 05:27:34PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 17:12, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 08:23:11PM +0100, Anton Berezin wrote: > > > > > > as it happens): there was a stale libperl.so in /usr/lib from when > > > > perl was in the tree, and a lot of perl modules were picking it up and > > > > linking against it, with the result that perl became broken when I > > > > cleaned up /usr/lib. > > > > > > It should not have happened, since all MakeMaker users (that is, 99.9% > > > of perl modules) get the linking information from perl itself, so either > > > the modules you mentioned were somehow picking an older perl, or they > > > were installed at the time when the older perl was the only perl. > > > > I can't remember the specifics any more..marcus might remember, but > > they definitely survived a full rebuild of p5* and continued to link > > against /usr/lib/libperl.so. > > All I did to fix this problem for fenner was to rebuild Perl by itself. > I didn't touch any of the modules. After that, fenner's script worked > again. Thanks, It would be interesting to know what exactly went wrong, but I doubt we'll find that out at this point. \Anton. -- If I did know the future of Perl, and if I told you, you'd probably run away screaming. -- Larry Wall