From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 2 21:27:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2617106567D for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pntr@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f11.google.com (mail-fx0-f11.google.com [209.85.220.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E678FC0C for ; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oliver.pntr@gmail.com) Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so1194378fxm.19 for ; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:27:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=1bVo+9ESY9TyuAohKUs4iX3gikGvoLLeWfi21/qFaO8=; b=DXkOuVIIIMdDJkmn+p0doBFvqRZ2sDnPcjSXjYCPeDFIkaL/xVhqgVIFpDBBYYwthD yRswg0EpqiunUQg9X/VmCHGbUf1fK1GKrrq2QYz393djlJ3YqlhivsloUeEOvNfNjaVx 54XAywvpuaV1VYLVxAH5T7VACXBS7BOS5p+eg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=iEFFuXSNX/gEyJsmmwt8skqIu6XtOx0mUmcGICZ2ETLrOibzvhO8kUZSrnic0FMzyg D/e85ekNguAS3PN2/vL12tR78wRf0AcIStasHKPjX2URWqQ31hSI9mScOuJxkptdyG45 O1E5eHvH3uf1kQLjfq5A9B5WxG0lGInKVhAUw= Received: by 10.103.172.9 with SMTP id z9mr6520108muo.39.1230931656282; Fri, 02 Jan 2009 13:27:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.103.193.6 with HTTP; Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:27:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6101e8c40901021327g7b976032hbe3ce935fbf15a5c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:27:36 +0100 From: "Oliver Pinter" To: "Ken Smith" In-Reply-To: <1230930492.12517.15.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <6101e8c40901021209g1eb6ca88wda79bd62823268bb@mail.gmail.com> <1230930492.12517.15.camel@neo.cse.buffalo.edu> Cc: "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.1 svn186551 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Jan 2009 21:27:39 -0000 Thanks the problem description, then I revert the reverted patch in my local tree. I had a similar problem between 7.1-PRERELEASE and 7.1-RC1, it presentdes only 1 week long, under heavy load (csup / kernel compile) crashed the system, but after RC1 the system is very stable (more than 2 week uptime, and ooo3 and kde build, every day several times csup, etc etc..) On 1/2/09, Ken Smith wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-02 at 21:09 +0100, Oliver Pinter wrote: >> Hi All! >> >> I have the question, why reverted the ICH10 support from 7.1? >> This is the svn commit: >> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/releng/?pathrev=186551 >> >> What is the PR number of the base of this commit or what is the >> problem description? >> >> I have a motherboard with ich10r with 3 sata2 disc (hitachi) + 1 sata >> dvd-rw (samsung), without any problem. >> >> Sorry for bad spelling or english > > Unfortunately most of the email traffic related to this was off-list. > There was one message here on list from Greg Miller saying his system > locked up and giving a date for when the problem got introduced which > was between 7.1-RC1 and 7.1-RC2 so it had been a regression that snuck > in while we were in the RC phase. It turned out the MFC that brought in > support for that chip was pulling in pieces of ATA from head that had > been intertwined with other work and it seemed likely the MFC wasn't > complete - more of the ATA pieces from head would need to be pulled in > to stabilize it. Since we were already so far behind on getting 7.1 out > we opted to back out the change rather than try to work out what else > needed to be MFCed (which would have definitely required RC3 if we tried > to do that). > > Sorry, it will just need to wait for 7.3 (though hopefully this plus the > extra stuff needed to stabilize it will work its way into 7-STABLE in > the not too distant future). > > -- > Ken Smith > - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu > there, funny things are everywhere. | > - Theodore Geisel | >