Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 22:52:32 +0200 From: Matthias Andree <mandree@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How are [MAINTAINER] patches handled and why aren't PRs FIFO? Message-ID: <4DB9D390.2090102@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20110428190745.GE77343@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> References: <4DB7B237.7000603@marino.st> <BANLkTinoGufNYZmkFgQmwGR4RjBXWXcDTA@mail.gmail.com> <20110427075436.70ae18ac@seibercom.net> <4DB96EC9.8000506@FreeBSD.org> <20110428190745.GE77343@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Am 28.04.2011 21:07, schrieb Chip Camden: > Correct me if I'm wrong, but as I understand it committers have commit > privilege for all ports. What if certain qualified port maintainers who > aren't committers were nevertheless given commit access for only the leaf > ports that they maintain? Wouldn't that speed up the overall process? It looks like you're asking for a technical solution to a non-technical problem. Chris Rees has posted an archive link, and my take is that we're already trying to ask such "qualified port maintainers" to become ports committers and not care too much about how fine-grained ports access is.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DB9D390.2090102>