From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org  Sat Jul  2 18:49:54 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588EEB8FF6A
 for <freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sat,  2 Jul 2016 18:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru)
Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B19B27A8
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Jul 2016 18:49:53 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru)
Received: from [10.0.0.1] (unknown [10.0.0.1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F32A1BA00
 for <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>; Sat,  2 Jul 2016 18:41:35 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim;
 t=1467484895; bh=NIawcU8NQ/vXP5ykk4dbdOu6DiDO4waWNPTTJm4eIHI=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
 b=aDWEp/sJ4I27kxRNTxWfcsat1EjtPGz6XKcULL9Ctj+tknee4w6x1OP9hPwvnNwOK
 6Csn0/rUh80bpbIMW01rZcS5Izxp7Ip8iS5gNtxN9p2lm6qqMDOpLjYDwMCvEOfz0s
 4XvABvamR+WD0NG4HOamsXGU2xpPr6NNai1hpPXQ=
Message-ID: <57780ADE.6020503@abinet.ru>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 21:41:34 +0300
From: abi <abi@abinet.ru>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:) Gecko/20160112 FossaMail/25.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: what to do when base openssl isn't suitable
References: <201607021610.u62GAkUS096413@gw.catspoiler.org>
In-Reply-To: <201607021610.u62GAkUS096413@gw.catspoiler.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2016 18:49:54 -0000

I tried to build www/nginx today, however it seems ignoring 
DEFAULT_VERSIONS knob.
Old style knobs works.

On 02.07.2016 19:10, Don Lewis wrote:
> On  2 Jul, Gerard Seibert wrote:
>> I have to admit that this whole discussion has gotten me confused. I
>> use "openssl" from ports, always have and probably always will. I use
>> to use the now apparently depreciate statement in the /etc/make.conf
>> file:
>>
>> WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=YES
> That's what I've been doing to build my own package set.
>
>>  From what I am reading, I would replace that line with the following
>> statement:
>>
>> DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=openssl
> I believe that is correct.
>
>> to force the use of the "ports" version of "openssl". Is that correct,
>> or is my interpretation of this incorrect?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"