From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 12:15:17 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F389D16A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:15:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E050643D55 for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:15:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tomonage2@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 04 Mar 2005 12:15:14 -0000 Received: from p54BF56F8.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO [192.168.0.200]) (84.191.86.248) by mail.gmx.net (mp011) with SMTP; 04 Mar 2005 13:15:14 +0100 X-Authenticated: #7843803 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 13:15:09 +0100 From: Jonathan Weiss To: FreeBSD-Hackers Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200503041051.j24Apgd9022285@cvs.openbsd.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: FW:FreeBSD hiding security stuff X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 12:15:17 -0000 Whats the intention behind the FreeBSD developers policy? ------ Weitergeleitete Nachricht Von: Theo de Raadt Datum: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 03:51:42 -0700 An: Betreff: FreeBSD hiding security stuff A few FreeBSD developers apparently have found some security issue of some sort affecting i386 operating systems in some cases. They have refused to give us real details. A promise is now being made. If a bug is found in OpenSSH, which we believe to have security consequences, we wil inform FreeBSD last. Fair is fair. I really wish it was not this way, but after a week of trying to get the policy to be fixed, we are changing our policy as well. Without immediate action from them to repair their polcy, and a public apology for this, that policy will stand. ------ Ende der weitergeleiteten Nachricht