From owner-freebsd-doc Wed Aug 30 10:36:34 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.aracnet.com (mail2.aracnet.com [216.99.193.35]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8620437B422 for ; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:36:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell1.aracnet.com (shell1.aracnet.com [216.99.193.21]) by mail2.aracnet.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id e7UHaaD06703; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:36:36 -0700 Received: by shell1.aracnet.com (8.9.3) id KAA01285; Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:36:33 -0700 Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2000 10:36:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Rick Hamell To: Neil Blakey-Milner Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HARDWARE.TXT vs. {i386,alpha}/RELNOTES.TXT In-Reply-To: <20000830192928.A95505@mithrandr.moria.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > So, it seems like what we ought to do is to sync up HARDWARE.TXT with > > RELNOTES.TXT (to make sure there's one consistent list), and then > > replace the hardware lists in RELNOTES.TXT with pointers to > > HARDWARE.TXT. Anyone we need to ask about this? > > I've noticed this before too. My only suggestion is that we should > continue to document _new_ support in RELNOTES. I thought RELNOTES referenced any NEW hardware in that release, while HARDWARE refrenced ALL supported hardware...? The pointers would be a good idea, most people are only wanting to go to one place. Rick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message